Case data-base migration
Situation
Company X, a trading company
in disposables, will be merged with company Z, a manufacturer in disposables.
The two companies already belong to an English organization with facilities all
over
Problem
Company X implemented
BPCS in March 2001 using BPCS V6.101. This implementation has been cumbersome
and this had a bearing on the implementation and the efficiency of BPCS in this
environment. Company Z implemented the same BPCS version in February 2002 after
a relative short implementation project. Although there are still some minor
issues to solve, this environment is stable and the implementation was a
success.
The structure of the
BPCS implementation at company Z has been set-up to enable the environment to
be extended with other companies, or allow a merger with other company group
operations.
Key objective
The new trading
entity will operate as a fully integrated business where the processes of
company Z will be the basis for this project.
Approach
A project group was
installed, consisting of senior key users from the several departments of
company Z and key users from the same departments of company X. This was done
to ensure that emphasis was put on the procedures of company Z. The first step
to be done was to list the business processes covered by BPCS at both
companies. Where there is an overlap in process than the company Z processes
will be the leading process and company X will be integrated into the company Z
process. The next step was to prototype the procedures, on the company Z
database, that where new for on of the two companies. This phase was ended with
a conference room pilot, to ensure that the prototyping was done successfully,
and end-user training, conducted by the key-users.
The actual database merge
consisted of transferring the master data, code tables and running data from
the company X data-base into that of company Z, with respect of data integrity
and data consistency. Codes are overlapping if, the code itself exists in both
environments or the contents of the codes exist in both environments but the
actual code is different
Result
The new company was
operational within 4 months.